Speaker summary
⁠38%2 analyzed articles/videos91 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kurtis Hagans results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 58.8% saturation with 117 hits. Analysis detected 524 faulty-reasoning hits from 91 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 26.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (16,283 of 28,364 speakers). This Kurtis Hagans is better (less manipulative) than 57.40% of the peer group.
Kurtis Hagans
Speaker details
Total words: 91
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

43% percentile
025507510042.6% percentile
26.3% BS Score2 analyzed videos91 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 58.8%58.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 31.2%31.2%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 31.2%31.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 40.2%40.2%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 17.1%17.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 17.1%17.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 18.6%18.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 9.1%9.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 31.2%31.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 9.1%9.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 58.8%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 40.2%, sitewide 19.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 31.2%, sitewide 0.8%Framing Effect: Speaker 31.2%, sitewide 26.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 31.2%, sitewide 3.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 18.6%, sitewide 6.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 17.1%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 17.1%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 5.3%Indoctrination: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos