Speaker summary
⁠83%1 analyzed article/video72 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kulmeet Bawa results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Begging the Question, and Confirmation Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 53.1% saturation with 38.25 hits. Analysis detected 236.25 faulty-reasoning hits from 72 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 37.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (12,650 of 28,364 speakers). This Kulmeet Bawa is worse (more manipulative) than 55.40% of the peer group.
Kulmeet Bawa
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 72
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

55% percentile
025507510055.4% percentile
37.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos72 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 53.1%53.1%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 35.4%35.4%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 35.4%35.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 29.2%29.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 35.4%35.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 35.4%35.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 35.4%35.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Optimism Bias: Speaker 53.1%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 35.4%, sitewide 11.1%Begging the Question: Speaker 35.4%, sitewide 1.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 35.4%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 35.4%, sitewide 8.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 35.4%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 29.2%, sitewide 0.5%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos