Speaker summary
ā 55%1 analyzed article/video435.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kristine Sherred results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 60 hits. Analysis detected 742.406 faulty-reasoning hits from 435.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.5% and a BS Rank of ā 5% (27,031 of 28,364 speakers). This Kristine Sherred is better (less manipulative) than 95.30% of the peer group.
Kristine Sherred
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
ā 0%The Brookings Institution1%
ā 0%Gen Jack Keane1%
ā 0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
ā 0%Mike Muse1%
ā 0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
ā 5%Kristine Sherred (selected)7%
ā 100%4MATIV100%
ā 100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
ā 100%314 Action Fund100%
ā 100%21 Grams100%
ā 100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 435.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

5% percentile
02550751004.7% percentile
6.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos435.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 7.7%7.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 8.8%8.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 10.2%10.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 12.6%12.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 9.4%9.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 1.1%1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 6.6%6.6%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 6.6%6.6%Tu QuoqueSitewide 0.2%Speaker 5.0%5.0%Representativeness Heurisā€¦Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 6.6%6.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 15.9%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 12.6%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Speaker 10.2%, sitewide 0.0%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 9.4%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 9.4%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 0.8%Anecdotal: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 5.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 5.3%Loss Aversion: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 1.9%Tu Quoque: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 0.2%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 0.2%Recency Bias: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos