Speaker summary
⁠68%1 analyzed article/video143.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kristine Day results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Halo Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 66% saturation with 107 hits. Analysis detected 306.879 faulty-reasoning hits from 143.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 45.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (10,808 of 28,364 speakers). This Kristine Day is worse (more manipulative) than 61.90% of the peer group.
Kristine Day
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 143.667
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

62% percentile
025507510061.9% percentile
45.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos143.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 84.1%84.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 66.0%66.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 38.0%38.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 25.3%25.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 13.2%13.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Optimism Bias: Speaker 84.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Speaker 66.0%, sitewide 5.2%Halo Effect: Speaker 38.0%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 25.3%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 13.2%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos