Speaker summary
⁠76%1 analyzed article/video53 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kristen Waggoner results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Confirmation Bias, and Ad Hominem, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 54.7% saturation with 29 hits. Analysis detected 255 faulty-reasoning hits from 53 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 48.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠64% (9,906 of 26,828 speakers). This Kristen Waggoner is worse (more manipulative) than 63.10% of the peer group.
Kristen Waggoner
Speaker details
Total words: 53
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

63% percentile
025507510063.1% percentile
48.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos53 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 54.7%54.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 54.7%54.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 45.3%45.3%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Speaker 45.3%45.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 45.3%45.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 54.7%54.7%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 45.3%45.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 45.3%45.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 45.3%45.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 45.3%45.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Anecdotal: Speaker 54.7%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 54.7%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 54.7%, sitewide 7.5%Ad Hominem: Speaker 45.3%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 45.3%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 45.3%, sitewide 9.1%Indoctrination: Speaker 45.3%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity Bias: Speaker 45.3%, sitewide 19.2%Red Herring: Speaker 45.3%, sitewide 0.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 45.3%, sitewide 1.1%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos