Speaker summary
⁠71%1 analyzed article/video101.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kristen Boyles results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Pessimism Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 65.8% saturation with 75 hits. Analysis detected 417.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 101.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 33.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (13,593 of 28,364 speakers). This Kristen Boyles is worse (more manipulative) than 52.10% of the peer group.
Kristen Boyles
Speaker details
Total words: 101.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

52% percentile
025507510052.1% percentile
33.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos101.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 65.8%65.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 57.9%57.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 38.2%38.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 28.9%28.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 28.9%28.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 44.7%44.7%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 23.7%23.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 15.8%15.8%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 15.8%15.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 15.8%15.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 65.8%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 57.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 44.7%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 38.2%, sitewide 8.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 28.9%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 28.9%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 23.7%, sitewide 1.5%Begging the Question: Speaker 15.8%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 15.8%, sitewide 4.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 15.8%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos