Speaker summary
⁠72%1 analyzed article/video101.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Krista Wright results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Framing Effect, and Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 63.2% saturation with 72 hits. Analysis detected 263.25 faulty-reasoning hits from 101.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 33.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (13,559 of 28,364 speakers). This Krista Wright is worse (more manipulative) than 52.20% of the peer group.
Krista Wright
Speaker details
Total words: 101.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

52% percentile
025507510052.2% percentile
33.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos101.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 52.0%52.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 63.2%63.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 30.3%30.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 13.2%13.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 13.2%13.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 30.3%30.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 63.2%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 52.0%, sitewide 0.0%Framing Effect: Speaker 30.3%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 30.3%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 13.2%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 13.2%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos