Speaker summary
⁠77%1 analyzed article/video126 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kira Shepherd results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Post Hoc (False Cause), and In-Group Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 35.7% saturation with 60 hits. Analysis detected 310.875 faulty-reasoning hits from 126 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 22% and a BS Rank of ⁠36% (18,275 of 28,364 speakers). This Kira Shepherd is better (less manipulative) than 64.40% of the peer group.
Kira Shepherd
Speaker details
Total words: 126
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

36% percentile
025507510035.6% percentile
22.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos126 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 43.1%43.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 29.8%29.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 35.7%35.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 20.8%20.8%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 14.9%14.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 14.9%14.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 20.2%20.2%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 10.1%10.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 8.3%8.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 43.1%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 35.7%, sitewide 19.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 29.8%, sitewide 3.3%In-Group Bias: Speaker 20.8%, sitewide 6.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 20.2%, sitewide 8.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 14.9%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Speaker 14.9%, sitewide 1.7%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos