Speaker summary
⁠75%1 analyzed article/video60 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kimiebi Imomotimi Ebienfa results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Quote-first Misdirection, and Halo Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 64.4% saturation with 58 hits. Analysis detected 425.375 faulty-reasoning hits from 60 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 39.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (12,081 of 28,364 speakers). This Kimiebi Imomotimi Ebienfa is worse (more manipulative) than 57.40% of the peer group.
Kimiebi Imomotimi Ebienfa
Speaker details
Total words: 60
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

57% percentile
025507510057.4% percentile
39.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos60 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 73.3%73.3%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 64.4%64.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 64.4%64.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 51.7%51.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 64.4%64.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 32.2%32.2%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 32.2%32.2%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 32.2%32.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 35.6%35.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 32.2%32.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%In-Group Bias: Speaker 73.3%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 64.4%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 64.4%, sitewide 6.7%Straw Man: Speaker 64.4%, sitewide 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 51.7%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 35.6%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 32.2%, sitewide 5.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 32.2%, sitewide 2.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 32.2%, sitewide 8.1%Indoctrination: Speaker 32.2%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 32.2%, sitewide 3.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 17.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 17.8%, sitewide 19.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 17.8%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Speaker 17.8%, sitewide 1.7%In-Group BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos