Speaker summary
⁠57%1 analyzed article/video117.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kimberly Richey results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Ad Hominem, and Indoctrination, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 54.3% saturation with 71.625 hits. Analysis detected 366.625 faulty-reasoning hits from 117.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 23.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠38% (17,628 of 28,364 speakers). This Kimberly Richey is better (less manipulative) than 62.10% of the peer group.
Kimberly Richey
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠38%Kimberly Richey (selected)24%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 117.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

38% percentile
025507510037.9% percentile
23.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos117.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 54.3%54.3%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 28.4%28.4%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 23.9%23.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 19.3%19.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 16.5%16.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 19.3%19.3%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Speaker 14.2%14.2%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 14.2%14.2%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 14.2%14.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 30.7%30.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 54.3%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 30.7%, sitewide 19.2%Ad Hominem: Speaker 28.4%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Speaker 23.9%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Speaker 19.3%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Speaker 19.3%, sitewide 6.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 16.5%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Speaker 14.2%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 14.2%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 14.2%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos