Speaker summary
⁠49%1 analyzed article/video134.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kimberley Reid results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Overconfidence Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 101 hits. Analysis detected 287.25 faulty-reasoning hits from 134.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 19.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠31% (19,709 of 28,364 speakers). This Kimberley Reid is better (less manipulative) than 69.50% of the peer group.
Kimberley Reid
Speaker details
Total words: 134.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

31% percentile
025507510030.5% percentile
19.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos134.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 28.7%28.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 8.9%8.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 11.9%11.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 14.4%14.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 16.3%16.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 8.9%8.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 14.4%14.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 28.7%, sitewide 6.0%Negativity Bias: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 16.3%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 14.4%, sitewide 15.9%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 14.4%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 11.9%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos