Speaker summary
65% 1 analyzed article/video 357.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kim Chi results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Authority , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 40.2% saturation with 143.694 hits . Analysis detected 552.935 faulty-reasoning hits from 357.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.7% and a BS Rank of 11% (25,290 of 28,364 speakers). This Kim Chi is better (less manipulative) than 89.20% of the peer group. Kim Chi
Speaker details
Total words: 357.667
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
11% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.8% percentile 9.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos357.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 40.2% 40.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 9.6% 9.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 6.6% 6.6% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Speaker 5.7% 5.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 5.0% 5.0% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 5.7% 5.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 11.9% 11.9% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 6.9% 6.9% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 5.7% 5.7% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Optimism Bias: Speaker 40.2%, sitewide 6.0% Framing Effect: Speaker 9.6%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 11.9%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 9.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 0.8% Burden of Proof: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 0.4% Slippery Slope: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 1.7% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 1.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst