Speaker summary
⁠93%1 analyzed article/video58 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kevin Roberts results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Anecdotal, and Status Quo Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 58 hits. Analysis detected 203 faulty-reasoning hits from 58 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 70% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (5,855 of 28,364 speakers). This Kevin Roberts is worse (more manipulative) than 79.40% of the peer group.
Kevin Roberts
Speaker details
Total words: 58
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

79% percentile
025507510079.4% percentile
70.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos58 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 5.2%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos