Speaker summary
⁠93%1 analyzed article/video68 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kenzie O'Keefe results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority and Indoctrination, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 68 hits. Analysis detected 136 faulty-reasoning hits from 68 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 66.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠79% (6,217 of 28,364 speakers). This Kenzie O'Keefe is worse (more manipulative) than 78.10% of the peer group.
Kenzie O'Keefe
Speaker details
Total words: 68
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

78% percentile
025507510078.1% percentile
66.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos68 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 55.9%55.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 44.1%44.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Optimism Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 55.9%, sitewide 11.1%Indoctrination: Speaker 44.1%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos