Speaker summary
⁠62%1 analyzed article/video78 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ken Dilanian results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Negativity Bias, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 39 hits. Analysis detected 156 faulty-reasoning hits from 78 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠68% (9,210 of 28,364 speakers). This Ken Dilanian is worse (more manipulative) than 67.50% of the peer group.
Ken Dilanian
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠68%Ken Dilanian (selected)50%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 78
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

68% percentile
025507510067.5% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos78 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 9.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos