Speaker summary
⁠52%1 analyzed article/video294.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ken Babby results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Optimism Bias, and Begging the Question, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 23.8% saturation with 62 hits. Analysis detected 221.965 faulty-reasoning hits from 294.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 20.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠34% (18,866 of 28,271 speakers). This Ken Babby is better (less manipulative) than 66.70% of the peer group.
Ken Babby
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 294.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

33% percentile
025507510033.3% percentile
20.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos294.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 23.0%23.0%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 18.8%18.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 23.8%23.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 17.3%17.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Halo Effect: Speaker 23.8%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 23.0%, sitewide 4.6%Begging the Question: Speaker 18.8%, sitewide 1.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 17.3%, sitewide 6.0%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos