Speaker summary
⁠72%3 analyzed articles/videos673 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kelly Hancock results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Genetic Fallacy, and Special Pleading, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 33.4% saturation with 225 hits. Analysis detected 663 faulty-reasoning hits from 673 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 10.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠14% (24,552 of 28,364 speakers). This Kelly Hancock is better (less manipulative) than 86.60% of the peer group.
Kelly Hancock
Speaker details
Total words: 673
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

13% percentile
025507510013.4% percentile
10.9% BS Score3 analyzed videos673 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 6.2%6.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 25.7%25.7%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Speaker 7.4%7.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 33.4%33.4%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Speaker 7.9%7.9%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 7.1%7.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 4.2%4.2%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 3.3%3.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 3.3%3.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 33.4%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 25.7%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 19.2%Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 1.4%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 7.5%Special Pleading: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 3.1%Burden of Proof: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 0.4%False Dilemma: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos