Speaker summary
51% 1 analyzed article/video 234.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kelley Daring results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Indoctrination , and Hasty Generalization , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 19.2% saturation with 111 hits . Analysis detected 673.673 faulty-reasoning hits from 234.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10% and a BS Rank of 12% (25,138 of 28,364 speakers). This Kelley Daring is better (less manipulative) than 88.60% of the peer group. Kelley Daring
Speaker details
Total words: 234.667
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
11% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.4% percentile 10.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos234.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 14.0% 14.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 19.2% 19.2% Horn Effect Sitewide 1.0% Speaker 14.3% 14.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 20.3% 20.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 5.7% 5.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 10.2% 10.2% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 8.1% 8.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 4.3% 4.3% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 5.9% 5.9% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Speaker 4.8% 4.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 25.8%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 20.3%, sitewide 8.1% Negativity Bias: Speaker 10.2%, sitewide 19.2% Anecdotal: Speaker 19.2%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 15.9% Horn Effect: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 1.0% Indoctrination: Speaker 14.0%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 7.5% False Dilemma: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 1.5% Optimism Bias: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 6.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 2.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst