Speaker summary
ā 82%1 analyzed article/video204.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Keisha Mulfort results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Fundamental Attribution Error, Negativity Bias, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 54.2% saturation with 116 hits. Analysis detected 683.065 faulty-reasoning hits from 204.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 18.1% and a BS Rank of ā 29% (20,287 of 28,364 speakers). This Keisha Mulfort is better (less manipulative) than 71.50% of the peer group.
Keisha Mulfort
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
ā 0%The Brookings Institution1%
ā 0%Gen Jack Keane1%
ā 0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
ā 0%Mike Muse1%
ā 0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
ā 29%Keisha Mulfort (selected)19%
ā 100%4MATIV100%
ā 100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
ā 100%314 Action Fund100%
ā 100%21 Grams100%
ā 100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 204.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

29% percentile
025507510028.5% percentile
18.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos204.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0ā€“75%
0.0%20%40%60%Politically Left Leaning ā€¦Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 54.2%54.2%Fundamental Attribution Eā€¦Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 28.7%28.7%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Speaker 23.8%23.8%Attempt to Sell a Productā€¦Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 23.8%23.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 23.8%23.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 7.9%7.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 23.8%23.8%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Speaker 12.0%12.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 11.2%11.2%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 12.0%12.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 54.2%, sitewide 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 28.7%, sitewide 2.7%Negativity Bias: Speaker 27.7%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 24.9%, sitewide 15.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 23.8%, sitewide 0.5%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 23.8%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 23.8%, sitewide 3.3%Special Pleading: Speaker 23.8%, sitewide 0.3%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 12.0%, sitewide 0.1%Straw Man: Speaker 12.0%, sitewide 0.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 2.2%In-Group Bias: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 6.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 1.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 8.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Left Leaning BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos