Speaker summary
⁠65%1 analyzed article/video621 analyzed words
BS Summary: These KC Water results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Loss Aversion as the most egregious example at 40.4% saturation with 206 hits. Analysis detected 775.122 faulty-reasoning hits from 621 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠12% (24,332 of 27,594 speakers). This KC Water is better (less manipulative) than 88.20% of the peer group.
KC Water
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠12%KC Water (selected)11%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 621
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

12% percentile
025507510011.8% percentile
10.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos621 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 40.4%40.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 4.9%4.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 27.9%27.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 7.5%7.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 7.8%7.8%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 4.4%4.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 3.4%3.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 5.0%5.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 5.7%5.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 4.6%4.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Loss Aversion: Speaker 40.4%, sitewide 2.5%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 27.9%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 8.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 4.0%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 3.3%Slippery Slope: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Loss AversionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos