Speaker summary
⁠62%1 analyzed article/video46.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kay Ivey results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Representativeness Heuristic, and Status Quo Bias, with Appeal to Nature as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 31 hits. Analysis detected 124 faulty-reasoning hits from 46.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠68% (9,200 of 28,364 speakers). This Kay Ivey is worse (more manipulative) than 67.60% of the peer group.
Kay Ivey
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 46.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

68% percentile
025507510067.6% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos46.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 8.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to NatureSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos