Speaker summary
⁠72%2 analyzed articles/videos133 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Katie Roberts results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Availability Heuristic, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 30.1% saturation with 68 hits. Analysis detected 282 faulty-reasoning hits from 133 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 24.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠40% (16,731 of 27,830 speakers). This Katie Roberts is better (less manipulative) than 60.10% of the peer group.
Katie Roberts
Speaker details
Total words: 133
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

40% percentile
025507510039.9% percentile
24.9% BS Score2 analyzed videos133 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 60.0%60.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 17.3%17.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 30.1%30.1%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 15.0%15.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 17.3%17.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 17.3%17.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 17.3%17.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Loss Aversion: Speaker 60.0%, sitewide 2.5%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 30.1%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 17.3%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 17.3%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 17.3%, sitewide 7.5%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 17.3%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Speaker 15.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss AversionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos