Speaker summary
⁠93%1 analyzed article/video150 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kathy Nester results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Representativeness Heuristic, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 73.3% saturation with 110 hits. Analysis detected 297 faulty-reasoning hits from 150 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 33% and a BS Rank of ⁠52% (13,872 of 28,364 speakers). This Kathy Nester is worse (more manipulative) than 51.10% of the peer group.
Kathy Nester
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 150
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

51% percentile
025507510051.1% percentile
33.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos150 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 73.3%73.3%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 28.7%28.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 26.7%26.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 26.7%26.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 16.0%16.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 26.7%26.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 73.3%, sitewide 11.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 28.7%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 26.7%, sitewide 0.8%Negativity Bias: Speaker 26.7%, sitewide 19.2%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 26.7%, sitewide 3.7%Halo Effect: Speaker 16.0%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos