Speaker summary
⁠79%1 analyzed article/video102.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Katherine Marsh results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Anecdotal, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 48.3% saturation with 49.491 hits. Analysis detected 160.491 faulty-reasoning hits from 102.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 24.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠40% (17,186 of 28,364 speakers). This Katherine Marsh is better (less manipulative) than 60.60% of the peer group.
Katherine Marsh
Speaker details
Total words: 102.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

39% percentile
025507510039.4% percentile
24.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos102.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 48.3%48.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 17.6%17.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 17.6%17.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 36.5%36.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 10.6%10.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 16.2%16.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 48.3%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 36.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 10.6%, sitewide 19.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 17.6%, sitewide 0.8%Anecdotal: Speaker 17.6%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 16.2%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos