Speaker summary
⁠93%1 analyzed article/video96 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kate Woodsome results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Availability Heuristic, and Hasty Generalization, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 48 hits. Analysis detected 288 faulty-reasoning hits from 96 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠68% (9,193 of 28,364 speakers). This Kate Woodsome is worse (more manipulative) than 67.60% of the peer group.
Kate Woodsome
Speaker details
Total words: 96
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

68% percentile
025507510067.6% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos96 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 50.0%50.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Anecdotal: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 8.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.1%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos