Speaker summary
⁠93%1 analyzed article/video15 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kate Wells results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 15 hits. Analysis detected 60 faulty-reasoning hits from 15 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠92% (2,297 of 28,364 speakers). This Kate Wells is worse (more manipulative) than 91.90% of the peer group.
Kate Wells
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 15
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

92% percentile
025507510091.9% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos15 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 19.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos