Speaker summary
69% 1 analyzed article/video 322 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Karisa Tang results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Status Quo Bias , False Dilemma , and Hasty Generalization , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 18.4% saturation with 59.209 hits . Analysis detected 529.668 faulty-reasoning hits from 322 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.9% and a BS Rank of 8% (26,306 of 28,364 speakers). This Karisa Tang is better (less manipulative) than 92.70% of the peer group. Karisa Tang
Speaker details
Total words: 322
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
7% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.3% percentile 7.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos322 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 7.2% 7.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 1.6% 1.6% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 13.9% 13.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 18.4% 18.4% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 10.6% 10.6% Circular Reasoning Sitewide 0.1% Speaker 7.5% 7.5% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 9.8% 9.8% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 7.2% 7.2% Appeal to Nature Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 4.7% 4.7% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 4.7% 4.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 26.9% Optimism Bias: Speaker 18.4%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 15.9% False Dilemma: Speaker 13.9%, sitewide 1.5% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 11.1% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 10.6%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 2.7% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 9.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 7.5% Circular Reasoning: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 0.1% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 1.9% Anecdotal: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Nature: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 0.2% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 1.1% Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst