Speaker summary
⁠93%1 analyzed article/video43 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kareem’s attorney results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Burden of Proof, Indoctrination, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 43 hits. Analysis detected 172 faulty-reasoning hits from 43 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠92% (2,283 of 28,364 speakers). This Kareem’s attorney is worse (more manipulative) than 92.00% of the peer group.
Kareem’s attorney
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠92%Kareem’s attorney (selected)100%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 43
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

92% percentile
025507510092.0% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos43 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Burden of Proof: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.4%Indoctrination: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos