Speaker summary
⁠47%1 analyzed article/video191.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kandis Williams results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Anecdotal, and Appeal to Emotion, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 18.2% saturation with 53 hits. Analysis detected 249.792 faulty-reasoning hits from 191.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 11.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠14% (24,422 of 28,364 speakers). This Kandis Williams is better (less manipulative) than 86.10% of the peer group.
Kandis Williams
Speaker details
Total words: 191.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

14% percentile
025507510013.9% percentile
11.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos191.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 22.0%22.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 18.2%18.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 8.3%8.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 13.6%13.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 11.3%11.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 2.8%2.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 11.3%11.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 12.0%12.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 6.2%6.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 5.5%5.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 22.0%, sitewide 4.6%Negativity Bias: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 19.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 18.2%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 13.6%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 12.0%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos