Speaker summary
⁠62%1 analyzed article/video56.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kaitlyn Chen results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Confirmation Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 66.7% saturation with 48 hits. Analysis detected 89 faulty-reasoning hits from 56.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 30.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠49% (14,547 of 28,364 speakers). This Kaitlyn Chen is better (less manipulative) than 51.30% of the peer group.
Kaitlyn Chen
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 56.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

49% percentile
025507510048.7% percentile
30.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos56.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 66.7%66.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 23.6%23.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 19.4%19.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 13.9%13.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 66.7%, sitewide 3.7%Anecdotal: Speaker 23.6%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 19.4%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 13.9%, sitewide 8.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos