Speaker summary
⁠35%2 analyzed articles/videos32 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kaelin Clay results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Halo Effect, and Status Quo Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 66.7% saturation with 32 hits. Analysis detected 96 faulty-reasoning hits from 32 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 40% and a BS Rank of ⁠59% (11,884 of 28,364 speakers). This Kaelin Clay is worse (more manipulative) than 58.10% of the peer group.
Kaelin Clay
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 32
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

58% percentile
025507510058.1% percentile
40.0% BS Score2 analyzed videos32 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 66.7%66.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 33.3%33.3%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 33.3%33.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 33.3%33.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 33.3%33.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 66.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 33.3%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 33.3%, sitewide 6.7%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 33.3%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 33.3%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos