Speaker summary
⁠93%1 analyzed article/video34 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Justin Theroux results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Overconfidence Bias, and Special Pleading, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 34 hits. Analysis detected 136 faulty-reasoning hits from 34 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠92% (2,259 of 28,364 speakers). This Justin Theroux is worse (more manipulative) than 92.00% of the peer group.
Justin Theroux
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 34
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

92% percentile
025507510092.0% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos34 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 4.6%Special Pleading: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos