Speaker summary
⁠75%1 analyzed article/video61.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Justin Heap results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Self-Serving Bias, and Halo Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 71.7% saturation with 66 hits. Analysis detected 207 faulty-reasoning hits from 61.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 41.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (11,489 of 28,364 speakers). This Justin Heap is worse (more manipulative) than 59.50% of the peer group.
Justin Heap
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 61.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

60% percentile
025507510059.5% percentile
41.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos61.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 71.7%71.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 53.3%53.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 46.7%46.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 28.3%28.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 28.3%28.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 21.7%21.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 71.7%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 53.3%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 46.7%, sitewide 3.7%Halo Effect: Speaker 28.3%, sitewide 6.7%Indoctrination: Speaker 28.3%, sitewide 0.0%Framing Effect: Speaker 21.7%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos