Speaker summary
⁠93%1 analyzed article/video13 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Justin Bieber results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 13 hits. Analysis detected 78 faulty-reasoning hits from 13 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠93% (2,252 of 28,364 speakers). This Justin Bieber is worse (more manipulative) than 92.10% of the peer group.
Justin Bieber
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 13
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

92% percentile
025507510092.1% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos13 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Anecdotal: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 19.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.1%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos