Speaker summary
⁠59%1 analyzed article/video119.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Julie Kirschbaum results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Halo Effect, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 42.1% saturation with 80 hits. Analysis detected 274.204 faulty-reasoning hits from 119.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 22.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (17,953 of 28,364 speakers). This Julie Kirschbaum is better (less manipulative) than 63.30% of the peer group.
Julie Kirschbaum
Speaker details
Total words: 119.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

37% percentile
025507510036.7% percentile
22.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos119.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 47.3%47.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 42.1%42.1%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Speaker 12.6%12.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 16.8%16.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 11.6%11.6%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 11.6%11.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 16.8%16.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Optimism Bias: Speaker 47.3%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 42.1%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 16.8%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 16.8%, sitewide 6.7%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 12.6%, sitewide 0.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos