Speaker summary
ā 39%1 analyzed article/video88 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Julia Bowsher results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Overconfidence Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 56.1% saturation with 74 hits. Analysis detected 243 faulty-reasoning hits from 88 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 36.8% and a BS Rank of ā 56% (12,728 of 28,364 speakers). This Julia Bowsher is worse (more manipulative) than 55.10% of the peer group.
Julia Bowsher
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
ā 0%The Brookings Institution1%
ā 0%Gen Jack Keane1%
ā 0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
ā 0%Mike Muse1%
ā 0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
ā 56%Julia Bowsher (selected)37%
ā 100%4MATIV100%
ā 100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
ā 100%314 Action Fund100%
ā 100%21 Grams100%
ā 100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 88
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

55% percentile
025507510055.1% percentile
36.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos88 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0ā€“75%
0.0%20%40%60%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 56.1%56.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 28.0%28.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 22.0%22.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 28.0%28.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 56.1%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 28.0%, sitewide 19.2%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 28.0%, sitewide 4.6%Optimism Bias: Speaker 22.0%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos