Speaker summary
⁠83%1 analyzed article/video44.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Judge Timothy Mazzei results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Horn Effect, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 73.8% saturation with 32.98 hits. Analysis detected 160.378 faulty-reasoning hits from 44.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 32.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠51% (14,084 of 28,364 speakers). This Judge Timothy Mazzei is worse (more manipulative) than 50.30% of the peer group.
Judge Timothy Mazzei
Speaker details
Total words: 44.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

50% percentile
025507510050.3% percentile
32.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos44.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 73.8%73.8%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Speaker 33.3%33.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 28.0%28.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 33.3%33.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 33.3%33.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 13.9%13.9%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 9.7%9.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 33.3%33.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Ad Hominem: Speaker 73.8%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 33.3%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 33.3%, sitewide 26.9%Horn Effect: Speaker 33.3%, sitewide 1.0%Negativity Bias: Speaker 33.3%, sitewide 19.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 28.0%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 13.9%, sitewide 5.3%False Dilemma: Speaker 9.7%, sitewide 1.5%Ad HominemSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos