Speaker summary
44%1 analyzed article/video853 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Judge Mark Pittman results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Straw Man, and Overconfidence Bias, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 19.7% saturation with 165 hits. Analysis detected 971.53 faulty-reasoning hits from 853 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.7% and a BS Rank of 4% (27,376 of 28,364 speakers). This Judge Mark Pittman is better (less manipulative) than 96.50% of the peer group.
Judge Mark Pittman
Speaker details
Total words: 853
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

4% percentile
02550751003.5% percentile
5.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos853 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 2.1%2.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 18.9%18.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 6.8%6.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 19.7%19.7%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 9.7%9.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 5.5%5.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 6.6%6.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 3.6%3.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 7.7%7.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 5.4%5.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 19.7%, sitewide 7.5%Negativity Bias: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 18.9%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 11.1%Straw Man: Speaker 9.7%, sitewide 0.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 8.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 2.5%Slippery Slope: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos