Speaker summary
⁠58%1 analyzed article/video197.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Judge Kathleen M. Williams results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Begging the Question, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 56.9% saturation with 121.504 hits. Analysis detected 374.232 faulty-reasoning hits from 197.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 22.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (18,032 of 28,364 speakers). This Judge Kathleen M. Williams is better (less manipulative) than 63.60% of the peer group.
Judge Kathleen M. Williams
Speaker details
Total words: 197.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

36% percentile
025507510036.4% percentile
22.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos197.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 56.9%56.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 24.8%24.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 23.3%23.3%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 24.8%24.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 11.1%11.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 12.6%12.6%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Speaker 4.2%4.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Negativity Bias: Speaker 56.9%, sitewide 19.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 24.8%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Speaker 24.8%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 23.3%, sitewide 0.0%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 12.6%, sitewide 8.1%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 11.1%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos