Speaker summary
⁠55%1 analyzed article/video54 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Juana Romero results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias and Anecdotal, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 76.9% saturation with 60 hits. Analysis detected 122 faulty-reasoning hits from 54 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 52.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (8,006 of 28,364 speakers). This Juana Romero is worse (more manipulative) than 71.80% of the peer group.
Juana Romero
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 54
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

72% percentile
025507510071.8% percentile
52.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos54 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 76.9%76.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 29.5%29.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 76.9%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Anecdotal: Speaker 29.5%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos