Speaker summary
⁠93%1 analyzed article/video112 analyzed words
BS Summary: These J’Tanya Adams results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Begging the Question, Appeal to Authority, and Appeal to Emotion, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 112 hits. Analysis detected 418 faulty-reasoning hits from 112 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 53.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (7,875 of 28,364 speakers). This J’Tanya Adams is worse (more manipulative) than 72.20% of the peer group.
J’Tanya Adams
Speaker details
Total words: 112
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

72% percentile
025507510072.2% percentile
53.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos112 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 44.6%44.6%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 44.6%44.6%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 44.6%44.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 44.6%44.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 44.6%44.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Optimism Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.0%Begging the Question: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 44.6%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 44.6%, sitewide 15.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 44.6%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 44.6%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 44.6%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos