Speaker summary
⁠65%1 analyzed article/video126.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jouke Vuurmans results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Loss Aversion, and Negativity Bias, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 66.3% saturation with 63 hits. Analysis detected 332 faulty-reasoning hits from 126.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 21.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠36% (18,382 of 28,364 speakers). This Jouke Vuurmans is better (less manipulative) than 64.80% of the peer group.
Jouke Vuurmans
Speaker details
Total words: 126.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

35% percentile
025507510035.2% percentile
21.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos126.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 66.3%66.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 21.6%21.6%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 21.6%21.6%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 21.6%21.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 10.0%10.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 20.0%20.0%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Speaker 11.6%11.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 16.8%16.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 21.6%21.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 6.8%6.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 66.3%, sitewide 7.5%Framing Effect: Speaker 10.0%, sitewide 26.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 21.6%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Speaker 21.6%, sitewide 2.5%Negativity Bias: Speaker 21.6%, sitewide 19.2%Slippery Slope: Speaker 21.6%, sitewide 1.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 20.0%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 16.8%, sitewide 8.1%Primacy Effect: Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 0.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos