Speaker summary
⁠52%1 analyzed article/video174 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joshua Windham results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Self-Serving Bias, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 34.5% saturation with 80 hits. Analysis detected 396 faulty-reasoning hits from 174 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 20.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠34% (18,879 of 28,364 speakers). This Joshua Windham is better (less manipulative) than 66.60% of the peer group.
Joshua Windham
Speaker details
Total words: 174
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

33% percentile
025507510033.4% percentile
20.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos174 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 34.5%34.5%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 16.4%16.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 15.5%15.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 18.1%18.1%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 15.5%15.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 16.4%16.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 32.8%32.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 21.6%21.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 16.4%16.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 34.5%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Speaker 32.8%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 21.6%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 16.4%, sitewide 19.2%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 18.1%, sitewide 3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 16.4%, sitewide 0.5%Optimism Bias: Speaker 16.4%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Speaker 15.5%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Speaker 15.5%, sitewide 2.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos