Speaker summary
⁠49%1 analyzed article/video778.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joshua Morris results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Burden of Proof, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 127 hits. Analysis detected 1,375.891 faulty-reasoning hits from 778.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠2% (27,783 of 28,364 speakers). This Joshua Morris is better (less manipulative) than 98.00% of the peer group.
Joshua Morris
Speaker details
Total words: 778.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

2% percentile
02550751002.0% percentile
4.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos778.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 6.3%6.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 11.8%11.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 10.3%10.3%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 8.5%8.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 3.9%3.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 9.2%9.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 1.9%1.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 2.1%2.1%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Speaker 4.2%4.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 12.7%12.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 12.7%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 11.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 7.5%Burden of Proof: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 0.4%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 0.2%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 2.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos