Speaker summary
⁠50%1 analyzed article/video372.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Josh Pigford results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Representativeness Heuristic, Appeal to Emotion, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Horn Effect as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 86 hits. Analysis detected 660.76 faulty-reasoning hits from 372.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠7% (26,532 of 28,364 speakers). This Josh Pigford is better (less manipulative) than 93.50% of the peer group.
Josh Pigford
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠7%Josh Pigford (selected)8%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 372.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

7% percentile
02550751006.5% percentile
7.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos372.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 2.8%2.8%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 18.9%18.9%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Speaker 14.5%14.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 11.8%11.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 10.4%10.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 12.6%12.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 2.9%2.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 12.3%12.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 5.2%5.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 13.0%13.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 19.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 18.9%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 13.0%, sitewide 15.9%Horn Effect: Speaker 14.5%, sitewide 1.0%Anecdotal: Speaker 12.6%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 8.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 0.8%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 3.1%Indoctrination: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Personal Incredulity: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos