Speaker summary
⁠54%1 analyzed article/video56 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Josh Madeiros results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Self-Serving Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 33.3% saturation with 21 hits. Analysis detected 123.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 56 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 20.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠33% (19,218 of 28,364 speakers). This Josh Madeiros is better (less manipulative) than 67.80% of the peer group.
Josh Madeiros
Speaker details
Total words: 56
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

32% percentile
025507510032.2% percentile
20.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos56 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 33.3%33.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 22.6%22.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 22.6%22.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 21.4%21.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 16.7%16.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 16.7%16.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 10.7%10.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 16.7%16.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Halo Effect: Speaker 33.3%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 22.6%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 22.6%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 21.4%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 16.7%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 16.7%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 16.7%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Speaker 10.7%, sitewide 6.0%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos