Speaker summary
⁠93%1 analyzed article/video81 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Josh Gerstein results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Biased Writer Voice, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 54 hits. Analysis detected 216 faulty-reasoning hits from 81 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 62.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠77% (6,724 of 28,364 speakers). This Josh Gerstein is worse (more manipulative) than 76.30% of the peer group.
Josh Gerstein
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠77%Josh Gerstein (selected)63%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 81
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

76% percentile
025507510076.3% percentile
62.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos81 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Framing Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 26.9%Ad Hominem: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 7.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos