Speaker summary
⁠65%2 analyzed articles/videos244.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Josh Arbon results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Confirmation Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 32.5% saturation with 79.5 hits. Analysis detected 442.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 244.5 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 16% and a BS Rank of ⁠25% (21,474 of 28,364 speakers). This Josh Arbon is better (less manipulative) than 75.70% of the peer group.
Josh Arbon
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 244.5
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

24% percentile
025507510024.3% percentile
16.0% BS Score2 analyzed videos244.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 32.5%32.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 19.0%19.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 16.9%16.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 16.9%16.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 23.0%23.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 19.0%19.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 6.4%6.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 4.6%4.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 5.5%5.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 32.5%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 23.0%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 19.0%, sitewide 7.5%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 19.0%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 16.9%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 16.9%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 9.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 0.8%Optimism Bias: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos