Speaker summary
⁠62%1 analyzed article/video62.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Josh Adam results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 47 hits. Analysis detected 188 faulty-reasoning hits from 62.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 62.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (6,432 of 26,780 speakers). This Josh Adam is worse (more manipulative) than 76.00% of the peer group.
Josh Adam
Speaker details
Total words: 62.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

76% percentile
025507510076.0% percentile
62.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos62.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Framing Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 26.9%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 4.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos