Speaker summary
67%2 analyzed articles/videos176 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joseph Wu results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 28.2% saturation with 83 hits. Analysis detected 422.784 faulty-reasoning hits from 176 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 15.8% and a BS Rank of 24% (21,592 of 28,364 speakers). This Joseph Wu is better (less manipulative) than 76.10% of the peer group.
Joseph Wu
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 176
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

24% percentile
025507510023.9% percentile
15.8% BS Score2 analyzed videos176 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 20.8%20.8%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 19.8%19.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 28.2%28.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 29.8%29.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 6.1%6.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 9.5%9.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 23.2%23.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 11.2%11.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 11.5%11.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 6.1%6.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Speaker 29.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 28.2%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 23.2%, sitewide 26.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 20.8%, sitewide 1.1%Ad Hominem: Speaker 19.8%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 11.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 6.9%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 4.6%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate